Volume 3, Issue 3, September 2018, Page: 99-104
Reproductive Health Rights: A Case Study in India
Abhilasha Mittal, Jindal Global Law School, O. P. Jindal Global University, Sonipat, India
Received: Aug. 8, 2018;       Accepted: Sep. 3, 2018;       Published: Sep. 27, 2018
DOI: 10.11648/j.wjph.20180303.15      View  185      Downloads  25
Abstract
Reproductive rights are seen as dynamic rights that can vary according to the evolution of the society. Although the World Health Organization gives a standard definition to explain this set of rights, there is still scope for wider interpretation of terms “mental, social and physical well being”. This paper, therefore, attempts to understand and interpret the scope via a list certain factors or indicators that could be applied to determine the standard of reproductive health in a country. The indicators for this paper have been attempted to be chosen in such a way that all the intricate factors are also accounted for under the broad headings. The paper also aims to apply these indicators on the availability of reproductive rights and its standards as given to women in India through various reports and case studies. This analysis will not only reveal the status of these rights in practice but also reveal one of the main reasons for the non-availability i.e. poverty and lack of access. The paper, in its final portion, concludes by recommending the state to enhance their policies with respect to these rights in order to ensure better health for not only improving the health of women, but to also improve the health of infants and men who are directly or indirectly affected by the same.
Keywords
Reproductive Rights, Dynamic, Indicators, India
To cite this article
Abhilasha Mittal, Reproductive Health Rights: A Case Study in India, World Journal of Public Health. Vol. 3, No. 3, 2018, pp. 99-104. doi: 10.11648/j.wjph.20180303.15
Copyright
Copyright © 2018 Authors retain the copyright of this article.
This article is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Reference
[1]
Mahmoud F. Fathalla, Promotion of Research inhuman Reproduction: Global Needs and Perspectives, 3 HUM.
[2]
Mahmoud F. Fathalla, Reproductive Health: A Global Overview, 626 Annals N.Y. Acad. Sci. 1,1 (1991).
[3]
Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Essay, Some Thoughts on Autonomy and Equality in Relation to Roe v. Wade, 63 N.C. L., Rev. 375, 383 (1985)
[4]
Lance Gable, Reproductive Health as a Human Right, Wayne State University Law School, Legal Studies Research Paper Series no. 10-20.
[5]
Lewis Hope, Female Genital Mutilation and Female Genital Cutting, in 2 Encyclopedia of Human Rights 200, 201 (David P. Forsythe ed., 2009).
[6]
Rebecca Cook and Bernard Dickens, Advancing Safe Motherhood Through Human Rights 6 (World Health Organization 2001).
[7]
Programme of Action of the International Conference on Population and Development, Cairo, Egypt, Sept. 5-13, (1994).
[8]
Center for Reproductive Rights, Maternal Mortality in India: Using International and Constitutional Law to Promote Accountability and Change.
[9]
UNFPA, Reducing Risks by Offering Contraceptive Services.
[10]
NFHS-3, International Institute for Population Sciences and Macro International, National Family Health Survey 2005-06: India, Volume 1, (2007).
Browse journals by subject